Sunday, May 3, 2009

consider the source

I am hungry enough to have the shakes and I have to study, as I would rather not go for a record of straight Ds on my physics exams. I will have to keep this brief. I'll also commit to the hope that my summer's posts will be better than what you have presented with thus far.

There seems to have been a lot of good versus bad going on in the past 10 years or so. Maybe I think the past 10 years because that is the about the amount of time that has passed since I left home for college. Regardless, there seems to be a growing perception of dichotomies.

1. Axis of evil vs Everyone (?) else
2. Liberal media vs Mainstream cable news
3. Anti war activists vs Hawkishness
etc.

I won't argue that the extremes don't exist. However there seems to be a failure sometimes to recognize all of the subtleties. It might not even be a failure, but rather a laziness that allows this to occur. So now our responsibility is (if we choose to accept the responsibility) is to sift through all this mess.

I saw Amy Goodman speak at my university last week (host/founder of Democracy Now!). If you haven't heard this program, I recommend a listen and not because I necessarily agree but because I believe that getting a variety of perspectives is a worthwhile endeavor.

I was approached by an anti-war activist who asked my companion and I if we would listen to his propaganda (his word, not mine) which essentially consisted of his asking if we wanted to attend a meeting. The audience consisted of many like-minded individuals, mostly evidenced by nods of agreement occurring in unison in response to Ms Goodman's comments or quips.

I also got to see 2003 Nobel Peace Prize winner Sharin Ebadi, of Iran, speak on a panel regarding the new administration and US-Iranian relations.

While I might be inclined to think that the attendees at this event were a little more diversified in their opinions, all shared at minimum an interest in the topic.

What these two speakers had in common was their message on the media. Both essentially said you will never get all of the information you need from one source, let alone the majority of the sources you'll be exposed to. Both stressed the importance of being informed and of the diversity of sources from which one should get his or her information. It was pretty interesting to see two very different and very distinguished women make essentially the same appeal to their audience while addressing two vastly different topics.

It might be the beginning of the end of the bullshit we see in items 1-3.

4 comments:

  1. This begs the question. Can those who still follow traditional media streams understand the subtleties of US foreign policy? I'd bet the average viewer wants the easily parsable infotainment CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC poop out. The news isn't about news it's about making money and pushing an agenda, you need to give your audiance what they want or you won't have one. I'm also pretty sure people want to hear what they already agree and don't notice the complete lack of journalistic quality. This explains the popularity of Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olberman. If a news organization explained the grey area then we would be forced to seriously consider our beliefs about the situation. It's too bad there isn't one book that would give complete undeniable guidance on all issues facing mankind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To once again quote the master:
    "Thanks to TV and the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative." -kv

    We are tribal creatures. It seems pretty programmed into us. We want there to be an "us" and a "them". I don't mean to seem pessimistic, but I just can't see the human race as losing this trait anytime soon. I mean, maybe some of them do, but then some other group calls them "evil" or whatever and it all starts over. Good luck on your exams. Physics sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "It's too bad there isn't one book that would give complete undeniable guidance on all issues facing mankind."

    I thought everyone knew about Plato's Republic.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, folks.
    I think this goes back to the idea of things being easily packaged (including one's own identity). In this case, the media is trying to sell us an identity.

    bunny - I think the us/them trait doesn't have to be negative. It is what creates families and friends, for example. I think that there is a desire to create that feeling of community (us/them - or however you would like to call it)in humankind and it is just that unfulfilled feeling that the news media tries to tap into (liberal v conservative) to create, market and sell to folks.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.